In many professional circles, AI is being hailed as a “superpower,” particularly when applied to the OODA loop—the strategic cycle of Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act. While the technology can technically execute every stage of this process, the real question is: should it?

Can AI Complete the Loop?

If an AI can ingest data (Observe), identify patterns (Orient), suggest a path (Decide), and execute a task (Act), does the human professional become redundant?

Applying the OODA loop to AI is a brilliant way to pinpoint where the “superpower” actually sits. AI is incredibly efficient at the Observation (data ingestion) and Orientation (pattern recognition) phases. It can sift through millions of variables to find a signal far faster than we can. However, keeping the “human in the loop” remains essential for the most critical parts of that cycle: Decision and Action.

A Tool, Not a Replacement

While AI is an unparalleled accelerator for the first two stages, the consensus among many experts and practitioners is that the human must remain firmly in the loop. The “superpower” isn't the AI itself; it is the human's ability to use AI to reach the decision point faster and with better information.

Why the Human Anchor Matters

By using AI to handle the heavy lifting of observation and orientation, we don't disappear from the loop; we simply move to the most critical part of it: making the calls that matter.

The man behind the model — Boyd’s military roots and the full theory: Inside the Loop →